Meanwhile, many of the thousands of climate activists congregated in Copenhagen for the summit found Hopenhagen so offensive that they made the campaign and installation itself an object of their protests. Hopenhagen is a classic example of corporate appropriation of people’s movements and the subsequent neutralization of the messages demanding structural change and social justice. As such, Hopenhagen embodies the conflict within the concept of design activism itself. While design functions predominately as a driver of consumption, consumerism, globalization and unsustainable behavior; activism is concerned with social injustice and environmental devastation. Activists struggle to combat the forces of globalization by forming social movements and resisting corporatisation of the commons and everyday life; designers are normally servant of corporate entities. These two forces are integrally at odds.
Corporations want to appear to be doing socially valuable design. Yet creating a campaign around the idea of stopping climate change, as part of a branded exercise within a corporate culture committed to intensive fossil fuel infrastructure, is worse than useless because it institutionalizes hypocrisy. This paper will describe how Hopenhagen 2009 damaged genuine people’s movements at Copenhagen. It will also prescribe strategies for public exhibitions to avoid the appropriation of dissent.
Photographs by Kristian Buus
I presented this paper at the Design History Society conference Design Activism and Social Change in Barcelona September 9th 2011. The full paper will be available on their website shortly.
EcoLabs 
Is the paper under embargo until then? In an age where I feel like climate isn’t talked about enough, I liked Hopenhagen [and yes, I was far away & not in the midst of the conversation]. These contradictions remind of of the rage of young Egyptian activists reacting to a NY Times article that explored how Gene Sharp- whom I admire and who has shaped my life– helped shape the event in Serbia via Otpor, and then Egypt.
They justifiably felt that the NYT was rendering them invisible & not talking about how the US & CIA funded torture and propped up the regime in Egypt– a narrative that never provoked the reader to wonder how their taxes were used.
I have not actually written the paper, it was accepted on the basis of the abstract. Interesting regarding the Gene Sharp/Egyptian activists parallel, thanks for sharing.
The paper can now be downloaded here: http://eco-labs.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=41&Itemid=108
Activists confront Coke in India – http://www.countercurrents.org/napm171211.htm